US: (877) 2GO-LUXURY (877-246-5898) UK: 020 8133 3450 AUS: (07) 3102 4685 Everywhere Else: +1 530-562-9232
US: (877) 2GO-LUXURY (877-246-5898) UK: 020 8133 3450 AUS: (07) 3102 4685 Everywhere Else: +1 530-562-9232
– Avalon Myanmar – Myanmar River Cruise – April 2017
Avalon Waterways – Myanmar – Part VI (Kya Hnyat to Kyauk Myaung)
Avalon Waterways – Myanmar – Part IX (The Ship: Avalon Myanmar)
Avalon Waterways – Myanmar (Burma) – Reflections: “Isn’t This Amazing!?”
*Azamara Club Cruises – Azamara Journey – Singapore to Dubai (April 8, 2018)
* Azamara Quest – Southeast Asia and Japan (February 2015)
– How Close to Luxury Can Celebrity’s Smallest Ship Get? – Part I
– How Close to Luxury Can Celebrity’s Smallest Ship Get? Part II
– How Close to Luxury Can Celebrity’s Smallest Ship Get? Part III
– How Close to Luxury Can Celebrity’s Smallest Ship Get? Part IV
– How Close to Luxury Can Celebrity’s Smallest Ship Get? – Some Final Observations and Thoughts
– The Prologue to the Travelogue
– The Adventure Begins…With a Bump or Two
– Settling In Made Easy
– Luxury Touches Here, There and OK, Not, Everywhere…But There Are Lots of Them!
– Asian Flair Onboard and On Shore
– Private Tours, Israel and Conflicts in Perceptions and Perspective
Celebrity Equinox 2009 – Egypt…Impressive and Depressing
– Dining With the Captain and the Reidel Wine Seminar
– The Last Dinner (Tuscan Grille) and Disembarkation
– What Happens When A Class Act Meets Highly Discounted Cruise Fare
– Lisbon to Monaco: Crystal As a “Move Up” & “Move Over” Luxury Option – Part I
– Lisbon to Monaco: Crystal As a “Move Up” & “Move Over” Luxury Option – Part II
– Lisbon to Monaco: Crystal As a “Move Up” & “Move Over” Luxury Option – Part III
– Lisbon to Monaco: Crystal As a “Move Up” & “Move Over” Luxury Option – Part IV (Food & Wine!)
– Princess Cruises Doesn’t Treat You Like Royalty; Celebrity Cruises Does! Which is a Better Value for the Upscale Cruise Guest? Part I
– Celebrity Silhouette vs. -Royal Princess – Which Is A Better Value For The Upscale Cruise Guest? Part II: The Standard Veranda Staterooms
– Celebrity Silhouette vs. Royal Princess – Which Is A Better Value For The Upscale Cruise Guest? Part III: Treating You Right From The Start
– Celebrity Silhouette vs. Royal Princess – Which Is A Better Value For The Upscale Cruise Guest? Part IV: The Wine Lists Speak Volumes (As Do The Beverage Packages)
Regent Seven Seas Voyager – August 2017
– Italy and Corisca 2014 – Part I
– Italy and Corisca 2014 – Part II (Getting There, The Stateroom and First Impressions)
– Italy and Corisca 2014 – Part III (“You Can’t Teach Five Star Service” and Bonafacio, Corsica)
– Italy and Corisca 2014 – Part IV (Calvi, Monaco, Portofino, Porto Azzurro…and Stale Bread)
– Italy and Corisca 2014 – Part V (My Last Day…and How The Chef’s Team Makes It Happen)
I have always had problems with how Oceania Cruises (and its sister brand, Regent Seven Seas Cruises) has done business. This time it is more than some of the more slick marketing practices that result in you paying more for your cruise than you should be as they convince you that you are getting a bargain (by, for example, telling you things are “free” when you are actually paying for them…and paying more than you would on pretty much any other cruise line). This one is more serious.
I have a client that needed to cancel their Oceania cruise when there was a fifty (50%) penalty. The math should be very easy. But this is where Oceania Cruises is just “slick” or worse. When calculating the “full fare” Oceania Cruises uses two (2) different formula (or, shall we say, definitions of “full fare”) dependent on whether you are cancelling at a 100% penalty rate or something lower. Huh?
Let’s backup for a moment so this madness (and I am being kind) can make some sense.
Oceania’s website states, “Cruise-related government fees and taxes are included”; clearly acknowledging that those dollars you paid over to Oceania Cruises towards governmental fees and taxes are not Oceania’s money…ever…but are merely collected by Oceania Cruises to be paid to the various governments for each actual passenger visiting its port on that particular cruise. We are talking collected taxes here for which Oceania is merely the legal safeguarder.
Oceania Cruises is not, and never will be, the owner of those tax dollars. It is similar to putting money into a trust account and it can only be used for its intended purpose. That is why if you ever skip a port (due to weather or otherwise) you will find a credit on your onboard account refunding the taxes and fees for that port back to you.
This is how Oceania rips you off and may well be acting unlawfully:
If you cancel at a 100% of the “full fare” penalty rate Oceania returns all of the governmental fees and taxes, but none of your cruise fare.
If you cancel your cruise at anything less than 100% Oceania only returns only a portion of the governmental taxes and fees along with remaining (unpenalized) cruise fare…but it tells you that it is properly keeping only a percentage of the “full fare”.
You could say that Oceania is using two different definitions of “full fare” or you could say that Oceania is intentionally deceiving you into believing it can properly convert 50% of the taxes you paid into its own money…violating that trust. I believe it is undeniably the latter.
Let me give you an example:
A couple books their cruise and each passenger (I can’t call them guests on Oceania, that’s for sure) has a cruise fare (after all discounts, credits, and whatever else Oceania markets) of $11,649.00, of which $355.00 are specifically designated as “Gov’t Fees and Taxes” (which, by the way and logically, Oceania specifically does not pay commissions on…because it is not their money or part of the cruise fare). They cancel when a 50% penalty applies. The math would seem simple:
WRONG. Oceania only uses that formula ONLY if there is a 100% penalty of the “full fare” because it knows that it cannot keep the taxes and fees it collected…and apparently it hasn’t been successful in finding a way to hide those entrusted funds from the governmental agencies, the regulators or the passengers.
When the penalty is less than 100% Oceania Cruises redefines “full fare” and pockets the taxes rather than refunding them, so in this 50% penalty example Oceania calculates the refund differently:
So passengers that do not know they are to get the taxes they paid refunded it makes sense and to the uneducated it seems to be proper since. However, by redefining “full fare” Oceania Cruises believes it has a literal “Safe Harbor” to convert your tax dollars into its profits.
By the way, Norwegian Cruise Lines does not play this game. It is far more transparent in its dealings. It’s terms and conditions state “Fares do not include certain taxes, fees, port expenses and charges imposed by governmental or quasigovernmental authorities.” That leads me to believe this is another Frank Del Rio approach that I just have so much trouble with.
I firmly believe this is something the regulators need to scrutinize and you, the cruising public, should be aware of.
To me it is a shame. Oceania Cruises has some wonderful and unique itineraries. Its ships are attractive. Its cuisine is quite good and its service staff work hard to please.
Why wouldn’t Oceania Cruises simply want to treat its passengers with respect and fairly? It seems that it isn’t about integrity. It is about short term profits…whether obtained properly or not.
Something to think about when you book your next cruise.
If you want a travel agent that truly looks out for you and makes sure you know what you really need to know, give me a call at (877) 2GO LUXURY or email me at eric@goldringtravel.com.
Goldring Travel LLC
12177 Business Park Drive, Suite 6, Truckee, California 96161
US: (877) 2GO-LUXURY (877-246-5898)
UK: 020 8133 3450
AUS: (07) 3102 4685
Everywhere Else: +1 530-562-9232
Email: info@goldringtravel.com