Over the past months I have been on a bit of a roll complaining about how cruise lines, even luxury lines, have treated its passengers (who used to be treated as “guests”) looking at their immediate bottom line rather than the long term one.
Royal Caribbean brands seem to consistently step up and do the right thing…and it pays off not only with the effected passengers, but the cruising public and, importantly, travel agents. I wrote about a less drastic event in October 2010 involving the Celebrity Century (Ship Happens) noting Celebrity Cruises (a Royal Caribbean brand) was taking better care of its passengers than Regent Seven Seas was when the Regent Voyager became disabled.
Earlier this year, Seabourn cancelled one of its summer Mediterreanean cruises…one that many guests had as a part of a longer cruise…and rather than, as in the past, offering them a complimentary cruise offered their passengers (formerly known as “guests”) a modest discount on a future cruise. And, by the way, I do not recall Seabourn ever having previously cancelled a peak season cruise for a charter because long term loyalty is just too dear. (You know I didn’t keep my mouth shut on that one!)
OK, with that preface…
As you may know, the Azamara Quest had a fire in its engine room this past week resulting in a fire that, although extinguished within an hour, disabled the ship temporarily (and, while no passengers were injured, there were a few crew members hurt, one seriously).
The ship eventually had one generator started (providing running water, lights and circulating air, among other services) and then one engine was able to be started allowing the ship to motor, slowly, to Sandakan, Malaysia where she now is undergoing assessment and repairs.
So what has Azamara Club Cruises done for its “guests” (no, they have not been treated as mere “passengers”!):
The way I calculate it, there is about $5,000 in direct holiday value given to each guest, plus a refund of the cruise fare, pluse airline change fees plus a complimentary cruise, so call it about $10,000 per guest in total “value”. (That does not mean it will be that much in Azamara out-of-pocket expenses as they surely have negotiated rates with hotels and have insurance or reserves for these sorts of highly unusual events.)
But – and this is important – imagine the cost of the “black eye” if Azamara Club Cruises hadn’t done right by its guests….not only with its passengers, but the cruising public and, to be sure, the top travel agents.
Oh, and by the way, Azamara Club has been excellent in keeping the public informed of what has been going on. Posts on its website, posts on its Facebook page and, of course, direct contact with the media. Open and as transparent as reasonably possible.
All of this, to my mind, creates confidence in a brand when intuitively one would think the opposite.
Now, think about this:
I have been proponent of Azamara Club Cruises because of its service levels, very interesting itineraries, fairly inclusive nature (included gratuities, soft drinks, water and coffees, wines with meals, etc.) and cuisine. While it standard cabins are small, once you get to the suite level things are more than adequate for a near luxury experience.
But most have been pretty resistant to my suggestions of Azamara Club offerings. One of my clients – who just booked another luxury cruise with Goldring Travel – recently recalled her Azamara Club cruise as “an amazing time“.
With a cruise line that shows it values you as much as Azamara Club Cruises just has during this recent unfortunate episode, don’t you think that you just might want to put in on your radar? It has been on mine!
Trust me. Have I ever steered you wrong?